COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF DIGESTION METHODS FOR SOIL SAMPLES DURING THE RADIOCHEMICAL DETERMINATION OF 239+240Pu
https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2023-2-82-88
Abstract
A great many nuclear tests of different types and yields were conducted at the Semipalatinsk Test Site (STS). That has lead to the formation of radioactively contaminated areas within it, which differed from one another in the pattern, levels and the isotopic composition. At the same time, technogenic radionuclides are oftentimes in the soil cover of STS in tightly bound and slightly soluble forms, which hampers their complete extraction from samples for a subsequent quantitative analysis. Typically, the extraction process is carried out in open systems using solutions of hydrofluoric acid (HF) and other mineral acids. However, this technique is time-consuming, requires a great many reagents and may result in the loss of elements to be assayed as well as in a possible cross contamination of samples. Autoclave digestion can be an alternative to acid digestion in open systems. This method, on the one hand, is devoid of the disadvantages inherent in open decomposition, on the other hand, it has an undoubted advantage, which consists in accelerating the decomposition process due to an increase in the boiling point of acids. As demonstrated by experimental findings, measurements of 239+240Pu activity concentration in soil samples obtained from a complete acid and autoclave decomposition, in most cases, agree well enough with one another (the existing discrepancies are within the measurement error). Analysis of a radioactivity reference standard using the autoclave decomposition technique showed satisfactory results. The deviation from a certified value was in the order of 5%.
About the Authors
S. Ye. SalmenbayevKazakhstan
Kurchatov
Zh. U. Kerimkulova
Kazakhstan
Kurchatov
F. F. Zhamaldinov
Kazakhstan
Kurchatov
К. Т. Mustafina
Kazakhstan
Kurchatov
К. A. Pontak
Kazakhstan
Kurchatov
Sh. M. Dauletbayeva
Kazakhstan
Kurchatov
L. I. Senger
Kazakhstan
Kurchatov
References
1. Osobennosti probootbora i probopodgotovki ob"ektov okruzhayushchey sredy. Uchebno-metodicheskiy kompleks distsipliny – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo «Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. A.M. Gor'kogo». – 2008. – 47 p.
2. Safarova V.I. Sposoby probopodgotovki pochvy, donnykh otlozheniy i tverdykh otkhodov dlya atomno-absorbtsionnogo opredeleniya tyazhelykh metallov / V. I. Safarova i dr. // Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov. – 2010. – Vol. 76, No. 2. – P. 10–14.
3. Madin M.I. Osnovnye faktory, opredelyayushchie kachestvennye i kolichestvennye pokazateli analiza veshchestva pri kompleksnom izuchenii i pererabotke mineral'nogo syr'ya / M.I. Madin i dr. // Izvestiya NTN RK. Seriya geologicheskaya. – 2006. – No. 5. – P. 91–97.
4. Lobachev A.L. Probootbor i probopodgotovka v analize ob"ektov okruzhayushchey sredy uchebnoe posobie / A.L. Lobachev, I.V. Lobacheva, E.V. Revinskaya. – Samara: Izd-vo «Samarskiy universitet». – 2005. – 32 p.
5. Slesar' N.I. Metodicheskie osnovy analiza ob"ektov. Metodicheskie ukazaniya k praktikumu studentov bakalavrov IV-go kursa Instituta khimii SPbGU. SPb.: Izd-vo VVM. – 2015. – 40 p.
6. Surikov V.T. Kislotnoe rastvorenie kremniya i ego soedineniy dlya analiza metodom mass-spektrometrii s induktivno svyazannoy plazmoy // Analitika i kontrol'. – 2008. – Vol. 12. – No. 3–4. – P. 93–100.
7. Tret'yakova E.I., Plotnikova O.E., Il'ina E.G. Mikrovolnovoy metod podgotovki prob dlya opredeleniya obshchego fosfora v ob"ektakh okruzhayushchey sredy / E.I. Tret'yakova, O.E. Plotnikova, E.G. Il'ina // Polzunovskiy vestnik. – 2008. – No. 1–2. – P. 152–156.
8. Karpov Yu.A., Orlova V.A. Sovremennye metody avtoklavnoy probopodgotovki v khimicheskom analize veshchestv i materialov // «Zavodskaya laboratoriya. Diagnostika materialov». – 2007. – No. 1. Vol.73. – P. 4–11.
9. Troeglazova A.V. Issledovanie i sovershenstvovanie metodov analiza reniysoderzhashchego syr'ya i produktov ego pererabotki. Diss. na soisk. uchen. stepeni doktora filosofii (PhD): 6D060600 Almaty. – 2011. – 131 p.
10. Chernikova I.I. Razrabotka sposobov mikrovolnovoy probopodgotovki v analize ferrosplavov, shlakoobrazuyushchikh smesey i rudnykh materialov metodom atomnoemissionnoy spektrometrii s induktivno svyazannoy plazmoy. Diss. na soisk. uchen. stepeni k.kh.n. Voronezh. – 2018. – 124 p.
11. Navarrete-López M., Jonathan M.P., Rodríguez-Espinosa P.F., Salgado-Galeana J.A. Autoclave decomposition method for metals in soils and sediments // Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. – 2012. – Vol. 184. – P. 2285–2293, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2117-4
12. Bakhur A.E i dr. Radioaktivnye chastitsy v pochvakh Semipalatinskogo poligona / A.E. Bakhur, V.T. Dubinchuk, L.A. Berezina, L.I. Manuilova, V.I. Malyshev, B.R. Berikbolov, I.A. Shishkov, A.P. Ermilov // Radiatsiya i risk – 1997. – Vol. 9. – P. 71–84.
13. Artem'ev O.I., Akhmetov M.A., Ptitskaya L.D. Radioaktivnoe zagryaznenie territorii Cemipalatinskogo poligona ot atmosfernykh yadernykh ispytaniy / O.I. Artem'ev, M.A. Akhmetov, L.D. Ptitskaya// Vestnik NYaTs RK. Radioekologiya. okhrana okruzhayushchey sredy. Issue 3, september 2000. P. 29–34.
14. Gorlachev I.D. i dr. Issledovanie i sistematizatsiya “goryachikh” chastits v pochvakh Semipalatinskogo ispytatel'nogo poligona / I.D. Gorlachev, T.N. Kvochkina, B.B.Knyazev, S.N. Lukashenko // Aktual'nye voprosy radioekologii Kazakhstana. [Sbornik trudov Natsional'nogo yadernogo tsentra Respubliki Kazakhstan za 2010 g.] – Issue 3. – Vol. 2. – Pavlodar: Dom pechati. – 2011. – P. 11–59.
15. Kunduzbaeva A.E., Lukashenko S.N., Magasheva R.Yu. Formy nakhozhdeniya iskusstvennykh radionuklidov v pochvakh na territorii ploshchadki «Opytnoe pole» / A.E. Kunduzbaeva, S.N. Lukashenko, R.Yu. Magasheva // Aktual'nye voprosy radioekologii Kazakhstana [Sbornik trudov Natsional'nogo yadernogo tsentra Respubliki Kazakhstan za 2011–2012 gg.] / pod red. S.N. Lukashenko. – Vol. 2. – Issue 4. – Pavlodar: Dom pechati. – 2013. – P. 181–208.
16. Lukashenko S., Kabdyrakova A., Lind O.C. et al. Radioactive particles released from different sources in the Semipalatinsk Test Site // J. Environ. Radioact. – 2020. – Vol. 216. – P. 106160.
17. Kunduzbayeva A.Ye., Lukashenko S.N., Kabdyrakova A.M., Larionova N.V., Magasheva R.Yu., Bakirova G.A. Speciation of 137Cs, 90Sr, 241Am, and 239+240Pu artificial radionuclides in soils at the Semipalatinsk test site // Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, Vol. 249, 2022. 106867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106867
18. KZ.06.01.00195-2020. Metodika vypolneniya izmereniy udel'noy aktivnosti izotopov plutoniya v ob"ektakh okruzhayushchey sredy al'fa-spektrometricheskim metodom s radiokhimicheskoy podgotovkoy – Kurchatov. 2020.
Review
For citations:
Salmenbayev S.Ye., Kerimkulova Zh.U., Zhamaldinov F.F., Mustafina К.Т., Pontak К.A., Dauletbayeva Sh.M., Senger L.I. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF DIGESTION METHODS FOR SOIL SAMPLES DURING THE RADIOCHEMICAL DETERMINATION OF 239+240Pu. NNC RK Bulletin. 2023;(2):82-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2023-2-82-88