Preview

NNC RK Bulletin

Advanced search

STRUCTURING OF AN AQUEOUS SUSPENSION OF A SULFUR-GYPSUM MIXTURE IN THE PRESENCE OF A COMPOSITION OF SURFACTANTS AND WATER-SOLUBLE POLYMERS

https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2023-3-103-110

Abstract

In this article, the methods of colloidal chemistry show the ways of using accumulated sulfur in oil production and the possibility of structuring a mixture of sulfur with gypsum in the presence of surfactants and polymer complexes. Compositions consisting of anionic polyelectrolyte (NaKMC) and cationic (CTAB), cationic polyelectrolyte (PDMDAAH) and anionic sulfanol surfactant were prepared, their effect on the surface tension of water, ζ-potential and the effect of polymer and surfactant on sulfur were studied. It was found that with an increase in the relative concentration of the polymer-surfactant composition, the plastic strength of the suspension increases, and after a certain time the strength decreases. This is explained by the fact that when the polar part of the surfactant is added to the polar part of the polymer, the polymer becomes hydrophobic, is better adsorbed on sulfur particles, and the strength of the entire system increases. And when all the polar parts of the polymer are neutralized by the polar parts of the surfactant, the surfactant molecules begin to adsorb on the polymer with their hydrophobic part. As a result, the polymer begins to shrink and form a globule. In this case, the plastic strength of the system decreases.

About the Authors

K. Toshtay
al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



G. M. Abyzbekova
Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda University
Kazakhstan

Kyzylorda



S. Azat
Satbayev University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



References

1. Alimbaev T., Yermagambetova K., Kabyltayeva S., Issayev A., Kairat, Z., Mazhitova Z. Environmental problems of the oil and gas industry in Kazakhstan //E3S Web of Conferences. – EDP Sciences, 2020. – Vol. 215. – P. 03008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021503008

2. Gossen L. P., Velichkina L. M. Environmental problems of the oil-and-gas industry //Petroleum Chemistry. – 2006. – Vol. 46. – P. 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544106020010

3. Bødtker G., Thorstenson T., Lillebø B. L. P., Thorbjørnsen B. E., Ulvøen R. H., Sunde E., Torsvik T. The effect of long-term nitrate treatment on SRB activity, corrosion rate and bacterial community composition in offshore water injection systems //Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. – 2008. –Vol. 35. – №. 12. – P. 1625-1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0406-x

4. Kalb P. D. et al. Sustainable Development in Kazakhstan: Using Oil & Gas Production by-Product Sulfur for Cost-Effective Secondary End-Use Products //REWAS 2004 Global Symposium on Recycling, Waste Treatment and Clean Technology, Madrid, İspanya, Eylül. – 2004.

5. Zharylkassyn P. et al. Formulation of Composite Materials Containing Tengiz Sulfur-Oil Production Waste //Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology. – 2021. – Vol. 22.

6. Lee J. W., Tai S. W. Environmental management and sustainable development in the oil and gas industry: A case study from Kazakhstan //Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health. – CRC Press, 2008. – P. 201-214.

7. Sung S., Kim B. H., Lee S., Choi S., Yoon W. Y. Increasing sulfur utilization in lithium-sulfur batteries by a Co-MOF-74@ MWCNT interlayer //Journal of Energy Chemistry. – 2021. – Vol. 60. – P. 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.12.033

8. Valle S. F., Giroto A. S., Klaic R., Guimaraes G. G., Ribeiro C. Sulfur fertilizer based on inverse vulcanization process with soybean oil //Polymer degradation and stability. – 2019. – Vol. 162. – P. 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.02.011

9. Turganbay S., Aidarova S. B., Bekturganova N. E., Li C. S., Musabekov K. B., Kumargalieva S. S., Toshtay K. Nanoparticles of sulfur as fungicidal products for agriculture //Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal. – 2012. – Vol. 14. – №. 4. – P. 313-319. https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj128

10. Rai M., Ingle A. P., Paralikar P. Sulfur and sulfur nanoparticles as potential antimicrobials: from traditional medicine to nanomedicine //Expert review of anti-infective therapy. – 2016. – Vol. 14. – №. 10. – P. 969-978. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2016.1221340

11. Banerjee S., Cazeneuve C., Baghdadli N., Ringeissen S., Leermakers F. A. M., Luengo G. S. Surfactant–polymer interactions: molecular architecture does matter //Soft Matter. – 2015. – Vol. 11. – №. 12. – P. 2504-2511. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SM00117J

12. Bhardwaj P., Kamil M., Panda M. Surfactant-polymer interaction: effect of hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose on the surface and solution properties of gemini surfactants //Colloid and Polymer Science. – 2018. – Vol. 296. – P. 1879-1889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-018-4409-5

13. Stubenrauch C., Albouy, P. A., Klitzing R., Langevin D. Polymer/surfactant complexes at the water/air interface: a surface tension and X-ray reflectivity study //Langmuir. – 2000. – Vol. 16. – №. 7. – P. 3206-3213. https://doi.org/10.1021/la991277j

14. Hill C., Abdullahi W., Dalgliesh R., Crossman M., Griffiths P. C. Charge modification as a mechanism for tunable properties in polymer–surfactant complexes //Polymers. – 2021. – Vol. 13. – №. 16. – P. 2800. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162800

15. Suksamranchit S., Sirivat A., Jamieson A. M. Polymer–surfactant complex formation and its effect on turbulent wall shear stress //Journal of colloid and interface science. – 2006. – Vol. 294. – №. 1. – P. 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.07.001

16. Guzmán E., Llamas S., Maestro A., Fernández-Peña L., Akanno A., Miller R., Rubio, R. G. Polymer–surfactant systems in bulk and at fluid interfaces //Advances in colloid and interface science. – 2016. – Vol. 233. – P. 38-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2015.11.001

17. Wang C., Tam K. C. New insights on the interaction mechanism within oppositely charged polymer/surfactant systems //Langmuir. – 2002. – Vol. 18. – №. 17. – P. 6484-6490. https://doi.org/10.1021/la025573z

18. Chakraborty T., Chakraborty I., Ghosh S. Sodium carboxymethylcellulose− CTAB interaction: a detailed thermodynamic study of polymer− surfactant interaction with opposite charges //Langmuir. – 2006. – Vol. 22. – №. 24. – P. 9905-9913. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0621214

19. Sardar N., Kamil M. Interaction between nonionic polymer hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) and cationic gemini/conventional surfactants //Industrial & engineering chemistry research. – 2012. – Т. 51. – №. 3. – С. 1227-1235. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2010725


Review

For citations:


Toshtay K., Abyzbekova G.M., Azat S. STRUCTURING OF AN AQUEOUS SUSPENSION OF A SULFUR-GYPSUM MIXTURE IN THE PRESENCE OF A COMPOSITION OF SURFACTANTS AND WATER-SOLUBLE POLYMERS. NNC RK Bulletin. 2023;(3):103-110. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2023-3-103-110

Views: 405


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-7516 (Print)
ISSN 1729-7885 (Online)