PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE STUDY OF SHELL EFFECTS IN MASS AND ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS OF FISSION FRAGMENTS OF 241Am* IN 240Pu(p,f) REACTION AT INCIDENT PROTON ENERGY OF 7 MeV
https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2025-1-175-178
Abstract
Shell effects are most pronounced in mass and energy distributions of fission fragments at the lowest excitation energy of compound nucleus. To study shell effects the mass and energy distributions of fission fragments of 241Am* compound nucleus in 240Pu(p,f) reaction were measured at incident proton energy of 7 MeV. This energy is substantially lower than coulomb barrier for this reaction leading to very small reaction cross-section and low speed of data acquisition. Due to that the results we provide are only preliminary and final results will be provided later after acquisition of additional statistics. The measurement was carried out by 2E method on U-150M accelerator of Institute of Nuclear Physics, Almaty city, Kazakhstan. The acquired preliminary mass and energy distributions were decomposed into yields of separate fission shells assuming that the shape of mass yield of each fission mode is gauss distribution.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. N. PanKazakhstan
Almaty
D. K. Alimov
Almaty
K. V. Kovalchuk
Almaty
N. Burtebayev
Almaty
D. M. Janseitov
Almaty
R. K. Kosherbayeva
Almaty
References
1. K.B. Gikal et al., Proton induced fission of 232Th at intermediate energies // Physics of Atomic Nuclei. – 2016. – Vol. 79, No. 9–10. – Pp. 1367–1374.
2. U. Brosa et al., Nuclear Scission // Phys. Rep. – 1990. – Vol. 197. – P. 167.
3. G. Scamps & C. Simenel, Impact of pear-shaped fission fragments on mass-asymmetric fission in actinides // Nature. – 2018. – Vol. 564. – P. 382.
4. G. Scamps & C. Simenel, Effect of shell structure on the fission of sub-lead nuclei // Phys. Rev. C. – 2019. – Vol. 100. – P. 041602(R).
5. E. Prasad et. al., Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb // Phys. Lett. B. – 2020. – Vol. 811. – P. 135941.
6. B. M. A. Swinton-Bland et. al., Mass-asymmetric fission of 205,207,209Bi at energies close to the fission barrier using proton bombardment of 204,206,208Pb // Phys. Rev. C. – 2020. – Vol. 102. – P. 054611.
7. K. Nomura et. al., Microscopic description of octupole collective excitations near N = 56 and N = 88 // Phys. Rev. C. – 2021. – Vol. 103. – P. 054301.
8. A. Chatillon et. al., Influence of proton and neutron deformed shells on the asymmetric fission of thorium isotopes // Phys. Rev. C. – 2022. – Vol. 106. – P. 024618.
9. Shivani Jain et. al., Investigation of octupole deformed fragments decaying from even-even isotopes of 222–230Th // Phys. Rev. C. – 2022. – Vol. 105. – P. 034605.
10. A.N. Pan et al., Shell effects in the fission of 236U* nuclei, formed in the reaction 232Th(α,f) at incident alpha particle energy of 29 MeV // NNC RK Bulletin. – 2023. – Vol. 2. – P. 4–8. https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2023-2-4-8.
11. E.M. Kozulin et al., Fission of 180,182,183Hg* and 178Pt* nuclei at intermediate excitation energies // Phys. Rev. C. – 2022. – Vol. 105. – P. 014607.
12. A.A. Bogachev et al., Asymmetric and symmetric fission of excited nuclei of 180,190Hg and 184,192,202Pb formed in the reactions with 36Ar and 40,48Ca ions // Phys. Rev. C. – 2021. – Vol. 104. – P. 024623.
13. T. Banerjee et al., Search for possible fission modes at high excitation energies in 254Fm // Phys. Rev. C. – 2022. – Vol. 105. – P. 044614.
Supplementary files
|
1. Экспериментально измеренное массово-энергетическое распределение осколков деления составного ядра 241Am*, полученного в реакции 240Pu(p,f) при энергии налетающих протонов 7 МэВ и разложения по вкладам отдельных мод деления | |
Subject | ||
Type | Результаты исследования | |
View
(122KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Pan A.N., Alimov D.K., Kovalchuk K.V., Burtebayev N., Janseitov D.M., Kosherbayeva R.K. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE STUDY OF SHELL EFFECTS IN MASS AND ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS OF FISSION FRAGMENTS OF 241Am* IN 240Pu(p,f) REACTION AT INCIDENT PROTON ENERGY OF 7 MeV. NNC RK Bulletin. 2025;(1):175-178. https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2025-1-175-178