Preview

NNC RK Bulletin

Advanced search

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO STRONG EARTHQUAKES IN CHINA AND TURKEY BASED ON NNC RK NETWORK DATA

https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2024-4-138-146

Abstract

The paper deals with various aspects of registration of strong earthquakes with magnitude Mw≥7 in Turkey and China (2023 and 2024) by seismic arrays of the National Nuclear Center network in terms of view of the efficiency of their participation in seismic monitoring. The uncertainties of values of azimuths and travel times by seismic arrays. Recommendations are given for analysts on the use of different stations in processing data from the areas of the earthquakes under study. The records of infrasound stations were analyzed in order to detect signals from these strong earthquakes. Signals were found on station IS31 (Aktobe) from the Turkish earthquakes and station Makanchi from the Chinese earthquakes.

About the Authors

O. V. Ryabenko
RSE NNC RK Branch “Institute of Geophysical Research”
Kazakhstan

Kurchatov



V. I. Dubrovin
RSE NNC RK Branch “Institute of Geophysical Research”
Kazakhstan

Kurchatov



References

1. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ЗемлетрясениевТурциииСирии(2023)

2. https://so.news.cn/ЗемлетрясениевКитае/22/

3. https://kz.kursiv.media/2024-01-23/dmnv-zemletryaseniev-kitae/

4. http://www.gangyiku.com//xuexi/330432.html

5. Mikhailova N.N. Seismic Data of Kazakhstani Stations to Solve Seismic Safety Problems in Kazakhstan // NNC RK Bulletin. – 2008. Issue 2. – P. 79–84. (In Rus.)

6. https://www.emsc-csem.org/

7. https://kndc.kz/

8. https://www.ctbto.org/

9. https://www.usgs.gov/

10. Aristova I.L., Mikhailova N.N. Aftershock Sequences of Large Earthquakes on the Territory of Kazakhstan and Adjacent Countries // NNC RK Bulletin. – 2017. Issue 2. – P. 83–92. (In Rus.)

11. Bormann, P. Magnitude of seismic events, in IASPEI / ed. P. Bormann // New Manual of Seimological Observatory Practice. – Potsdam: GeoForschungsZentrum. –2002. – Vol. 1. – P. 16–50.

12. Cansi Y. An automatic seismic event processing for detection and location: The P.M.C.C. method // Geophys. Res. Lett. – 1995. – Vol. 22. – P. 1021–1024.

13. Le Pichon, J. Guilbert, M. Valle´e, J. X. Dessa, M. Ulziibat Infrasonic imaging of the Kunlun Mountains for the great 2001 China earthquake // Geophysical Research Letters. – 2003. – Vol. 30. – Issue 15. – P. 1814. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl017581

14. W.L. Donn, E.S. Posmentier Ground-coupled air waves from the great Alaskan earthquake //J. Geophys. Res.. – 1964. – Vol. 69. – Р. 5357–5361.

15. R. K. Cook Infrasound radiated during the Montana earthquake of 1959 August 18 // Geophys. J. R. – 1971. – Astr. Soc., – Vol. 26. – Р. 191–198.

16. Y.Takanashi, Y. Koyama, T. Isei, In situ measured infrasound at Sapporo associated with an earthquake occurring offshore in southwest Hokkaido on July 12, 1993 // J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. – 1994. – Vol. 15. – P. 409–411.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Ryabenko O.V., Dubrovin V.I. COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO STRONG EARTHQUAKES IN CHINA AND TURKEY BASED ON NNC RK NETWORK DATA. NNC RK Bulletin. 2024;(4):138-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2024-4-138-146

Views: 219


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1729-7516 (Print)
ISSN 1729-7885 (Online)