COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO STRONG EARTHQUAKES IN CHINA AND TURKEY BASED ON NNC RK NETWORK DATA
https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2024-4-138-146
Abstract
The paper deals with various aspects of registration of strong earthquakes with magnitude Mw≥7 in Turkey and China (2023 and 2024) by seismic arrays of the National Nuclear Center network in terms of view of the efficiency of their participation in seismic monitoring. The uncertainties of values of azimuths and travel times by seismic arrays. Recommendations are given for analysts on the use of different stations in processing data from the areas of the earthquakes under study. The records of infrasound stations were analyzed in order to detect signals from these strong earthquakes. Signals were found on station IS31 (Aktobe) from the Turkish earthquakes and station Makanchi from the Chinese earthquakes.
About the Authors
O. V. RyabenkoKazakhstan
Kurchatov
V. I. Dubrovin
Kazakhstan
Kurchatov
References
1. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ЗемлетрясениевТурциииСирии(2023)
2. https://so.news.cn/ЗемлетрясениевКитае/22/
3. https://kz.kursiv.media/2024-01-23/dmnv-zemletryaseniev-kitae/
4. http://www.gangyiku.com//xuexi/330432.html
5. Mikhailova N.N. Seismic Data of Kazakhstani Stations to Solve Seismic Safety Problems in Kazakhstan // NNC RK Bulletin. – 2008. Issue 2. – P. 79–84. (In Rus.)
6. https://www.emsc-csem.org/
7. https://kndc.kz/
8. https://www.ctbto.org/
9. https://www.usgs.gov/
10. Aristova I.L., Mikhailova N.N. Aftershock Sequences of Large Earthquakes on the Territory of Kazakhstan and Adjacent Countries // NNC RK Bulletin. – 2017. Issue 2. – P. 83–92. (In Rus.)
11. Bormann, P. Magnitude of seismic events, in IASPEI / ed. P. Bormann // New Manual of Seimological Observatory Practice. – Potsdam: GeoForschungsZentrum. –2002. – Vol. 1. – P. 16–50.
12. Cansi Y. An automatic seismic event processing for detection and location: The P.M.C.C. method // Geophys. Res. Lett. – 1995. – Vol. 22. – P. 1021–1024.
13. Le Pichon, J. Guilbert, M. Valle´e, J. X. Dessa, M. Ulziibat Infrasonic imaging of the Kunlun Mountains for the great 2001 China earthquake // Geophysical Research Letters. – 2003. – Vol. 30. – Issue 15. – P. 1814. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl017581
14. W.L. Donn, E.S. Posmentier Ground-coupled air waves from the great Alaskan earthquake //J. Geophys. Res.. – 1964. – Vol. 69. – Р. 5357–5361.
15. R. K. Cook Infrasound radiated during the Montana earthquake of 1959 August 18 // Geophys. J. R. – 1971. – Astr. Soc., – Vol. 26. – Р. 191–198.
16. Y.Takanashi, Y. Koyama, T. Isei, In situ measured infrasound at Sapporo associated with an earthquake occurring offshore in southwest Hokkaido on July 12, 1993 // J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. – 1994. – Vol. 15. – P. 409–411.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Ryabenko O.V., Dubrovin V.I. COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TWO STRONG EARTHQUAKES IN CHINA AND TURKEY BASED ON NNC RK NETWORK DATA. NNC RK Bulletin. 2024;(4):138-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52676/1729-7885-2024-4-138-146